| Services -
Orthodontics: Orthodontics for Children |
| |
| Children are a special
case because they are growing. This makes them ideal
subjects for orthopedic intervention. ("Ortho" means
to straighten and "pedo" means child.) Because they
are fairly pliable and the bone is relatively soft
and always growing and changing, it is easy to guide
the bone growth in children through external means.
An oak tree, tied in a knot when it is a tiny
sapling, will grow in a hundred years into a huge
oak tree with a knot tied in its trunk. What was
possible when the tree was immature becomes
impossible in maturity. (There is some argument
about whether the movement of children's teeth is
actually faster than that of adults, but there is no
argument about the ease of movement due to the
growth factor.) |
| |
| As every mother knows,
their children grow faster at some ages than at
others. Therefore, orthodontic practitioners want to
time their treatments for the ages when the child is
mature enough to cooperate with treatment, and also
when the bone is growing most rapidly. The optimum
age for beginning treatment depends upon the
specific deformity that the orthodontic practitioner
needs to correct, but the best age for evaluation of
that specific deformity is usually age 7 because
that is the age when both factors tend to coincide
for the treatment of certain skeletal deformities. A
major growth spurt takes place at puberty, and
orthodontists like to take advantage of this as
well. When deformities are assessed early and
treated prior to the time that they have fully
developed, we have "intercepted" the problem and
this is referred to as interceptive
orthodontics. |
| |
|
| |
| What are the
benefits of early treatment? |
| |
| For those patients who
have clear indications for early orthodontic
intervention, early treatment presents an
opportunity to: |
| |
| 1- guide the growth of the
jaw, |
| 2- regulate the width of
the upper and lower dental arches (the arch- shaped
jaw bone that supports the teeth), |
| 3- guide incoming
permanent teeth into desirable positions,
|
| 4- lower risk of trauma
(accidents) to protruded upper incisors (front
teeth), |
| 5- correct harmful oral
habits such as thumb- or finger-sucking,
|
| 6- reduce or eliminate
abnormal swallowing or speech problems, |
| 7- improve personal
appearance and self-esteem, |
| 8- potentially simplify
and/or shorten treatment time for later corrective
orthodontics, |
| 9- reduce likelihood of
impacted permanent teeth (teeth that should have
come in, but have not), and |
| 10- preserve or gain space
for permanent teeth that are coming in. |
| |
| The Congenital Skeletal Deformities |
| |
| Class I |
| |
| Congenital skeletal
deformities are conditions occurring at birth and
are usually caused by genetic factors. In order to
understand what constitutes a deformity, however, it
is necessary to understand what constitutes the
generally accepted standards of normality.
|
| |
In
the diagram, the central image shows the most normal
facial profile. In dentistry, we look at the way the
top and bottom teeth come together to determine the
exact nature of the profile. This type of profile is
called a Class I occlusion (occlusion means the way
the top and bottom teeth line up together) and it is
characterized by the relative positions of the upper
and lower first molars (the molars are the large
back teeth, and the first molars are the large back
teeth that are furthest forward). The detail of the
teeth under the main images show how the first
molars line up in each case. From the point of view
of appearance, the class I occlusion yields the best
profile. Class I occlusion is considered the
standard for "normality". Class I deformities are
generally the result of crowding, extra space, or
from developmental deformities. |
| Class II |
| |
| The image to the right
shows the class II profile. This is probably the
most common skeletal deformity (deviation from
"normal"). This occlusion yields a "weak" chin, or
retruded chin profile. Extreme cases give an "Andy
Gump" appearance. While this represents a deformity,
in fact it can be quite attractive on some women. |
| |
It
can have the overall effect of drawing attention to
the eyes, and can account for the "all eyes"
attractiveness that some women possess. No matter
what you think of the appearance of the profile,
this occlusion does leave the patient with
functional problems involving the position of the
front teeth (incisors). The lower incisors
frequently do not touch the upper incisors when the
back teeth are together, and this allows the lower
incisors to erupt up into the gums at the roof of
the mouth, and allows the top incisors to erupt into
an unattractively "long" and "gummy" appearance,
well beyond the edge of the top lip. |
| ClassIII |
| Class III deformities
yield a "prognathic", or "strong chin" appearance.
This could be caused by over development of the
lower jaw, or by underdevelopment of the upper jaw .
This profile is not usually considered attractive on
women, however it can be an asset to men, depending
on the image they wish to project. |
| |
is
associated with the "tough guy" or "bulldog" image
projected by the 1940's movies, and gives a
singularly masculine appearance that we associate
with football players today. As with class II
occlusions, this profile is associated with
functional and esthetic problems. Since the lower
incisors are located in front of the upper incisors,
they too can erupt to unattractive lengths. This
profile can be associated with a "smooth cheekbone"
appearance and a tendency not to show the upper
front teeth when talking or even when smiling.
Biting can be a real problem for these people in
extreme cases, because while class I and II profiles
can stick their lower jaws out further to bite off a
piece of food, it is impossible for the class III
profile to draw his lower jaw any further back to
make the front teeth meet. |
| What is all
that "Equipment" that the Patient Wears During
Treatment? |
| |
Orthodontic
practitioners use lots of complicated wires, jack
screws, elsatics and "retainer-like" appliances to
accomplish their orthodontic/orthopedic goals.If you
have specific questions regarding the purposes of
things like headgear, bionators, palatal expansion
devices and various other stuff that looks like it
was invented by someone in Dracula's dungeons, the
best thing to do is to corner your orthodontist and
ask why you or your child needs it. He or she knows
your child's needs specifically and can speak
directly to your concerns. If this is not possible,
click on the icon to the right to proceed to a site
that goes into the technical reasons for these
devices. This link brings you to an internal page at
the site with a good navigation bar that allows you
to go directly to your point of interest. |
| The
Developmental Deformities |
| |
| Developmental deformities
treated by orthodontist practitioners are caused by
environmental factors such as thumb sucking and lip
habits, as well as by other physical errors such as
an inability to breath through the nose due to sinus
and allergy problems, or the failure of some of the
teeth to develop. These deformities are often
associated with narrow upper arches, and/or an open
anterior bite such as that seen in the image of the
thumb sucking habit below. This category also
includes crowded, crooked teeth since in this case
there is a discrepancy between the size of the teeth
and the space available in the dental arches to
accommodate them. Of course, all these problems
often occur in combination and there is frequently
no neat division between them in any given case.
Therefore, every case is unique and must be handled
with completely different treatment plans.
|
| |
| Thumb Sucking |
| |
| Thumb sucking is a habit
that will generally subside on its own. By the time
the child is in grade school, he or she wants to
stop because it has already become a social
liability. |
| |
If
stopped by age 6 or 7, even the open bite pictured
above will revert back to normal. Upon occasion, a
child will want to stop, but be unable to break the
habit. Under these circumstances, it can be helpful
to insert a fixed (not removable) habit breaking
device as a "reminder" not to put the thumb into the
mouth. These work well provided that the child wants
to stop the habit. If the habit persistspast the age
of 12, the skeletal deformity you see on the left
can persist for the rest of that person's life. |
|
The
picture at the left of this page is of a child who
will likely develop a open bite as a result of a
persistent tongue thrust habit which is similar to
the habit of "reverse swallowing" in which the
tongue is pushed out between the teeth every time
the child swallows. Note also that the habit of
persistently biting or sucking on the lower lip can
produce similar deformities. These habits are all
handled with their own habit breaking appliance
designs. |
| |
| Mouth breathing |
| |
| The normal development of
the oral structures depends upon the ability of the
child to breath through the nose without
obstruction, especially at night. This does NOT mean
that if your child gets an occasional cold and can't
breath through his nose he will grow up with oral
abnormalities. However, chronic obstruction of the
nasal airway due to deviated septum, persistent
allergies or other anatomic abnormality will tend to
cause the roof of the mouth (the hard palate) to
rise and the back upper right and left teeth to
collapse toward each other. We call this condition a
constricted arch. The teeth are arranged in arches.
|
| |
| The picture on the right
is a model of a constricted arch. The model on the
left has a more normal arch form. A patient with the
teeth on the right will have a smile that shows
mostly the two prominent front teeth, with the
others in shadow. The one on the left shows a
normally shaped arch form resulting in a broader
smile |
| |
| Crossbites |
| |
| In most instances, the
constriction of the upper arch is accompanied by
some degree of constriction in the lower arch caused
by the tilting of the lower teeth toward the tongue.
However, the degree of lower constriction is not
enough to keep the upper and lower back teeth in the
correct relationship with each other. This produces
a condition known as crossbite in which the top back
teeth hit on the inside cusps of the lower back
teeth instead of on the outside cusps which is the
normal relationship. |
| |
Figure
A shows a schematic view from the front of the mouth
with teeth in a normal biting situation. Figure B
shows the teeth in a crossbite situation. Posterior
crossbites like this can have pronounced effect on
the overall facial appearance, especially when they
are unilateral (on one side of the mouth only). When
a unilateral posterior cross-bite is present in a
young person, it can cause asymmetric development of
the facial muscles and the jaw joint which means
that one side of the face may grow larger than the
other. |
| |
| Crowded and
missing teeth |
| |
| Nature tries to fit the
teeth into the space available. The teeth always end
up in their most stable position within the dental
arch, whether they are crowded, or have extra space
between them. Stability is the name of the game.
There is always a balance between the various forces
that affect any given tooth, as well as the amount
and position of bone available, that helps determine
where that tooth is most stable. If a dentist tries
simply to move the teeth into better looking
positions, Nature may move them right back where
they started. This is why an orthodontc practitioner
must play certain tricks to make sure the local
forces effecting each tooth will cancel each other
out after treatment so that the tooth will stay put
once it is moved. |
| |
| This is why the
orthodontic practitioners must usually treat both
upper and lower teeth, even if only the appearance
of the top teeth are of concern to the patient.
Unless the position of the lower teeth coincide with
the position of the uppers, the biting forces
produced by the ill fitting lowers will create
instabilities that will move the uppers back into
crooked positions over time. This is also the reason
that the orthodontist will order the extraction of
some teeth. The extra room created by the removal of
these teeth changes the stability equation in favor
of the preferred new tooth positions. |
| |